Idaho Health Care Reform
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law a comprehensive health care reform bill, the Affordable Care Act (ACA). ACA includes numerous reforms aimed at improving the U.S. health care delivery system, controlling health care costs and expanding health coverage. ACA’s reforms have staggered effective dates; some provisions are effective now, while others take effect in 2014 and later.
ACA is a federal law, which means that federal agencies, namely the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services and the Treasury, are primarily responsible for the law’s overall enforcement. However, ACA also creates significant responsibilities for state governments. A number of ACA’s key health care reforms will be carried out at the state level.
This Employment Law Summary provides a high-level overview of selected ACA reforms to be implemented by state governments and highlights the progress being made in Idaho.
HEALTH INSURANCE EXCHANGES
ACA requires each state to have a health insurance exchange (Exchange) to provide a competitive marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to purchase affordable private health insurance coverage, effective Jan. 1, 2014. According to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Exchanges will make it easier for individuals and small businesses to compare health plan options, receive answers to health coverage questions, determine eligibility for tax credits for private insurance or public health programs and enroll in suitable health coverage.
Individuals and small employers with up to 100 employees will be eligible to participate in the Exchanges. However, states may limit employers’ participation in the Exchanges to businesses with up to 50 employees until 2016. Beginning in 2017, states may allow businesses with more than 100 employees to participate in the Exchanges. Enrollment in the Exchanges is expected to begin onOct. 1, 2013.
States have three options with respect to their Exchanges. A state may:
· Establish its own state-based Exchange;
· Have HHS operate a federally facilitated Exchange (FFE) for its residents; or
· Partner with HHS so that some FFE Exchange functions can be performed by the state.
States that intend to pursue a state-based Exchange or a state partnership Exchange must submit a blueprint to HHS. The blueprint must contain a declaration letter signed by the state’s governor and an application describing readiness to perform Exchange activities and functions. If a state does not move forward with its Exchange or select the partnership model, HHS will operate the FFE in the state.
Idaho is planning to implement a state-based Exchange, effective Jan. 1, 2014. On Jan. 3, 2013, Idaho received conditional approval from HHS for its state-based Exchange. HHS will provide final approval when the state can demonstrate that its Exchange will be able to perform all required operations on time and in compliance with federal regulations.
Additional information on Idaho’s exchange planning is available at: www.doi.idaho.gov/HealthExchange/SBEBlueprint.aspx.
INSURANCE RATE REVIEW
To help hold insurance companies accountable for their proposed rate hikes, ACA required HHS to establish a process to review the reasonableness of certain premium increases.
Effective Sept. 1, 2011, insurers seeking rate increases of 10 percent or more for non-grandfathered plans in the individual and small group markets must publicly disclose the proposed increases, along with justification for the increases. After 2011, states may work with HHS to set state-specific thresholds for disclosure of rate increases, using data and trends that reflect cost trends particular to a state.
The proposed increases must be reviewed by either state or federal experts to determine whether they are reasonable. States with effective rate review systems will conduct their own reviews, but if a state does not have the resources or authority to conduct rate reviews, HHS will conduct them.
According to HHS, Idaho has an effective system for reviewing rate increases in both the individual and small group markets, with the exception of individual association products. The Idaho Department of Insurance conducts rate reviews in the individual and small group markets.
ESSENTIAL HEALTH BENEFITS
Beginning in 2014, ACA requires non-grandfathered plans in the individual and small group markets, both inside and outside of the Exchanges, to offer a core package of items and services. This core package is known as essential health benefits (EHBs).
Under ACA, EHBs include items and services in 10 general benefit categories, including hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services and prescription drugs.
ACA also directs that EHBs should be equal in scope to benefits offered by a typical employer health plan. To meet this requirement in every state, HHS further defines EHBs based on a state-specific benchmark plan. States can select a benchmark plan from among the following options:
· The largest plan by enrollment in any of the three largest products by enrollment in the state’s small group market;
· Any of the largest three state employee health benefit plans options by enrollment;
· Any of the largest three national Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) plan options by enrollment; or
· The HMO plan with the largest insured commercial non-Medicaid enrollment in the state.
If a state does not select a benchmark, HHS will select the largest plan by enrollment in the largest product by enrollment in the state’s small group market as the default benchmark plan.
The selected benchmark plans have been finalized for benefit year 2014. Since Idaho did not select a benchmark, the default EHB benchmark for the state will be the largest small group plan in the state-Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc., Preferred Blue PPO. More information on Idaho’s benchmark plan is available on The Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight (CCIIO)website.
HEALTH INSURANCE REFORMS
ACA requires sponsors of self-funded and insured group health plans to make changes to their plans’ design and administration over the next several years. For example, effective for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010, ACA requires:
· Group health plans to extend dependent coverage up to age 26; and
· Non-grandfathered group health plans to follow minimum requirements for external review of claims appeals.
Dependent Coverage Requirements
Although ACA creates federal standards, the health insurance market is primarily regulated at the state level. Some states may have laws that go beyond the federal minimums established by ACA. For example, some states extend dependent coverage beyond age 26.
Idaho law does not generally require insured health plans to maintain dependent coverage past the federal minimum, although it does require insured health plans to extend coverage past the policy’s limiting age for disabled dependents.
External Review Requirements
In addition, ACA requires insured plans to comply with their state’s external review process if it includes certain minimum consumer protections. If a state’s external review process does not include the required minimum consumer protections, health insurers in the state must comply with a federal process for conducting external reviews, effective Jan. 1, 2012.
HHS has concluded that Idaho’s external review process includes the minimum consumer protections. Thus, insured health plans in Idaho must conduct external appeals in accordance with the state’s external review process.